In the Piri framework, incidents form a critical component of regulatory knowledge management. They represent real-world situations where systems, processes, or safeguards failed—or nearly failed—and therefore reveal the practical limits of existing controls. By systematically capturing incidents, Piri transforms individual events into structured knowledge that strengthens safety, compliance, and organizational learning.

Incidents help to:

• Expose Hidden Risks:
  Real events reveal failure modes, system weaknesses, and human factors that regulations alone may not fully anticipate.

• Clarify Regulatory Intent:
  Many rules are responses to past incidents. Documenting similar events helps explain why requirements exist and how they should be applied.

• Improve Risk Models:
  Incident data enriches the knowledge graph with empirical evidence, allowing more accurate assessment of likelihoods, impacts, and dependencies.

• Strengthen Preventive Measures:
  Patterns across incidents highlight recurring conditions or behaviors that need updated controls, training, or system design changes.

• Enable Cross-Domain Learning:
  Incidents from one domain can illuminate risks in another when modeled consistently within the Piri ontology.

  
  

By integrating incidents as first-class knowledge elements, the Piri framework ensures that regulatory and safety management is not based solely on abstract rules, but on lived experience and evidence. This makes compliance more resilient, risk assessments more realistic, and safety practices continuously adaptive to emerging challenges.

Incidents disrupt the normal functioning of systems and can cause inefficiency, downtime, or serious failure. To reduce these risks, it is important to manage knowledge about potential incidents in a proactive way. Understanding what could happen and how it might affect the system enables better preparation and prevention.

A key step is to classify incidents by type, cause, or severity. This makes patterns visible and allows knowledge to be reused across domains. By transferring proven components and countermeasures to new tasks, organizations can react faster, improve resilience, and ensure that lessons learned are not lost.

ecbro:Problem
  a owl:Class ;
  rdfs:subClassOf ecbro:AttributeValue, ecbro:eCBRoConcept ;
  rdfs:label "Case Problem"@en ;
  rdfs:comment "Defines the problem the case solved."@en ;
  dc:description "Represents the problem or challenge addressed and solved by the case."@en ;
  rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.ecbro.org/reference/#> .