Ranking
Ranking as a Tool for Prioritizing Regulatory Knowledge
Ranking assigns relative importance to different regulatory components, guiding attention and resources toward the most critical areas. In the Piri framework, incidents, measures, and contextual elements are not equally urgent or impactful. By evaluating their significance and interdependencies, ranking helps organizations focus on the regulations and actions that carry the highest safety and compliance value.
This structured prioritization supports decision-making under uncertainty, ensures efficient allocation of effort, and highlights areas where proactive intervention can prevent failures. Through ranking, regulatory knowledge becomes not just comprehensive, but strategically actionable, enabling organizations to manage risk intelligently and effectively.
Example
piri:importance_1 a piri:Importance ;
piri:preferredOver importance_2 .
piri:importance_2 a piri:Importance .
piri:measure_2 a piri:Prevent_Fires_From_Starting ;
piri:partOf piri:measure_1 ;
piri:preferredOver piri:measure_3 ;
piri:hasPreferenceAnnotation "Detecting and extinguishing quickly those fires which do start" ;
piri:hasPreferenceAnnotation "Preventing the spread of those fires which have not been extinguished" .
piri:proof_3 a piri:ProofPreferredOver ;
piri:hasPreferredMeasure piri:measure_2 ;
piri:hasInferiorMeasure piri:measure_3 ;
piri:hasAnnotation "Detecting and extinguishing quickly those fires which do start" ;
piri:hasAnnotation "Preventing the spread of those fires which have not been extinguished" ;
piri:hasContext piri:Context .
Please note, that these are two different ways to model that a measure is to be preferred over another.